more equality & tests
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b9da2a1e5
commit
a6f43a772e
7 changed files with 361 additions and 207 deletions
|
|
@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ NonRedexTerm q d n defs = Subset (Term q d n) (NotRedex defs)
|
|||
|
||||
parameters {0 isGlobal : _} (defs : Definitions' q isGlobal)
|
||||
namespace Term
|
||||
export %inline
|
||||
export covering %inline
|
||||
whnfD : Term q d n -> NonRedexTerm q d n defs
|
||||
whnfD = whnf $ \x => lookupElim x defs
|
||||
|
||||
namespace Elim
|
||||
export %inline
|
||||
export covering %inline
|
||||
whnfD : Elim q d n -> NonRedexElim q d n defs
|
||||
whnfD = whnf $ \x => lookupElim x defs
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -55,36 +55,52 @@ isTyCon (E {}) = True
|
|||
isTyCon (CloT {}) = False
|
||||
isTyCon (DCloT {}) = False
|
||||
|
||||
private
|
||||
isSubSing : Term {} -> Bool
|
||||
isSubSing ty =
|
||||
let Element ty _ = pushSubsts ty in
|
||||
case ty of
|
||||
TYPE _ => False
|
||||
Pi {res, _} => isSubSing res.term
|
||||
Lam {} => False
|
||||
Sig {fst, snd, _} => isSubSing fst && isSubSing snd.term
|
||||
Pair {} => False
|
||||
Eq {} => True
|
||||
DLam {} => False
|
||||
E e => False
|
||||
public export %inline
|
||||
sameTyCon : (s, t : Term q d n) ->
|
||||
(0 ts : So (isTyCon s)) => (0 tt : So (isTyCon t)) =>
|
||||
Bool
|
||||
sameTyCon (TYPE {}) (TYPE {}) = True
|
||||
sameTyCon (TYPE {}) _ = False
|
||||
sameTyCon (Pi {}) (Pi {}) = True
|
||||
sameTyCon (Pi {}) _ = False
|
||||
sameTyCon (Sig {}) (Sig {}) = True
|
||||
sameTyCon (Sig {}) _ = False
|
||||
sameTyCon (Eq {}) (Eq {}) = True
|
||||
sameTyCon (Eq {}) _ = False
|
||||
sameTyCon (E {}) (E {}) = True
|
||||
sameTyCon (E {}) _ = False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
parameters (defs : Definitions' q g)
|
||||
private
|
||||
isSubSing : Term q 0 n -> Bool
|
||||
isSubSing ty =
|
||||
let Element ty nc = whnfD defs ty in
|
||||
case ty of
|
||||
TYPE _ => False
|
||||
Pi {res, _} => isSubSing res.term
|
||||
Lam {} => False
|
||||
Sig {fst, snd, _} => isSubSing fst && isSubSing snd.term
|
||||
Pair {} => False
|
||||
Eq {} => True
|
||||
DLam {} => False
|
||||
E (s :# _) => isSubSing s
|
||||
E _ => False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
parameters {auto _ : HasErr q m}
|
||||
export %inline
|
||||
ensure : (a -> Error q) -> (p : a -> Bool) -> (t : a) -> m (So (p t))
|
||||
ensure e p t = case nchoose $ p t of
|
||||
Left y => pure y
|
||||
Right n => throwError $ e t
|
||||
Left y => pure y
|
||||
Right _ => throwError $ e t
|
||||
|
||||
export %inline
|
||||
ensureType : (t : Term q d n) -> m (So (isTyCon t))
|
||||
ensureType = ensure NotType isTyCon
|
||||
ensureTyCon : HasErr q m => (t : Term q d n) -> m (So (isTyCon t))
|
||||
ensureTyCon = ensure NotType isTyCon
|
||||
|
||||
parameters (defs : Definitions' q _) {auto _ : (CanEqual q m, Eq q)}
|
||||
mutual
|
||||
-- [todo] remove cumulativity & subtyping, it's too much of a pain
|
||||
-- mugen might be good
|
||||
namespace Term
|
||||
export covering %inline
|
||||
compare0 : TContext q 0 n -> (ty, s, t : Term q 0 n) -> m ()
|
||||
|
|
@ -92,7 +108,7 @@ parameters (defs : Definitions' q _) {auto _ : (CanEqual q m, Eq q)}
|
|||
let Element ty nty = whnfD defs ty
|
||||
Element s ns = whnfD defs s
|
||||
Element t nt = whnfD defs t
|
||||
tty <- ensureType ty
|
||||
tty <- ensureTyCon ty
|
||||
compare0' ctx ty s t
|
||||
|
||||
private %inline
|
||||
|
|
@ -107,9 +123,9 @@ parameters (defs : Definitions' q _) {auto _ : (CanEqual q m, Eq q)}
|
|||
m ()
|
||||
compare0' ctx (TYPE _) s t = compareType ctx s t
|
||||
|
||||
compare0' ctx ty@(Pi {arg, res, _}) s t = local {mode := Equal} $
|
||||
compare0' ctx ty@(Pi {arg, res, _}) s t {n} = local {mode := Equal} $
|
||||
let ctx' = ctx :< arg
|
||||
eta : Elim q 0 ? -> ScopeTerm q 0 ? -> m ()
|
||||
eta : Elim q 0 n -> ScopeTerm q 0 n -> m ()
|
||||
eta e (TUsed b) = compare0 ctx' res.term (toLamBody e) b
|
||||
eta e (TUnused _) = clashT ty s t
|
||||
in
|
||||
|
|
@ -117,7 +133,7 @@ parameters (defs : Definitions' q _) {auto _ : (CanEqual q m, Eq q)}
|
|||
(Lam _ b1, Lam _ b2) => compare0 ctx' res.term b1.term b2.term
|
||||
(E e, Lam _ b) => eta e b
|
||||
(Lam _ b, E e) => eta e b
|
||||
(E e, E f) => compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
(E e, E f) => Elim.compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
_ => throwError $ WrongType ty s t
|
||||
|
||||
compare0' ctx ty@(Sig {fst, snd, _}) s t = local {mode := Equal} $
|
||||
|
|
@ -137,75 +153,72 @@ parameters (defs : Definitions' q _) {auto _ : (CanEqual q m, Eq q)}
|
|||
-- e.g. an abstract value in an abstract type, bound variables, …
|
||||
E e <- pure s | _ => throwError $ WrongType ty s t
|
||||
E f <- pure t | _ => throwError $ WrongType ty s t
|
||||
compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
Elim.compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
|
||||
export covering
|
||||
compareType : TContext q 0 n -> (s, t : Term q 0 n) -> m ()
|
||||
compareType ctx s t = do
|
||||
let Element s ns = whnfD defs s
|
||||
Element t nt = whnfD defs t
|
||||
sok <- ensureType s
|
||||
tok <- ensureType t
|
||||
ts <- ensureTyCon s
|
||||
tt <- ensureTyCon t
|
||||
st <- either pure (const $ clashT (TYPE UAny) s t) $
|
||||
nchoose $ sameTyCon s t
|
||||
compareType' ctx s t
|
||||
|
||||
private covering
|
||||
compareType' : TContext q 0 n -> (s, t : Term q 0 n) ->
|
||||
(0 ns : NotRedex defs s) => (0 ts : So (isTyCon s)) =>
|
||||
(0 nt : NotRedex defs t) => (0 tt : So (isTyCon t)) =>
|
||||
(0 st : So (sameTyCon s t)) =>
|
||||
m ()
|
||||
compareType' ctx s t = do
|
||||
let err : m () = clashT (TYPE UAny) s t
|
||||
case s of
|
||||
TYPE k => do
|
||||
TYPE l <- pure t | _ => err
|
||||
expectModeU !mode k l
|
||||
compareType' ctx (TYPE k) (TYPE l) =
|
||||
expectModeU !mode k l
|
||||
|
||||
Pi {qty = sQty, arg = sArg, res = sRes, _} => do
|
||||
Pi {qty = tQty, arg = tArg, res = tRes, _} <- pure t | _ => err
|
||||
expectEqualQ sQty tQty
|
||||
compareType ctx tArg sArg -- contra
|
||||
-- [todo] is using sArg also ok for subtyping?
|
||||
compareType (ctx :< sArg) sRes.term tRes.term
|
||||
compareType' ctx (Pi {qty = sQty, arg = sArg, res = sRes, _})
|
||||
(Pi {qty = tQty, arg = tArg, res = tRes, _}) = do
|
||||
expectEqualQ sQty tQty
|
||||
local {mode $= flip} $ compareType ctx sArg tArg -- contra
|
||||
compareType (ctx :< sArg) sRes.term tRes.term
|
||||
|
||||
Sig {fst = sFst, snd = sSnd, _} => do
|
||||
Sig {fst = tFst, snd = tSnd, _} <- pure t | _ => err
|
||||
compareType ctx sFst tFst
|
||||
compareType (ctx :< sFst) sSnd.term tSnd.term
|
||||
compareType' ctx (Sig {fst = sFst, snd = sSnd, _})
|
||||
(Sig {fst = tFst, snd = tSnd, _}) = do
|
||||
compareType ctx sFst tFst
|
||||
compareType (ctx :< sFst) sSnd.term tSnd.term
|
||||
|
||||
Eq {ty = sTy, l = sl, r = sr, _} => do
|
||||
Eq {ty = tTy, l = tl, r = tr, _} <- pure t | _ => err
|
||||
compareType ctx sTy.zero tTy.zero
|
||||
compareType ctx sTy.one tTy.one
|
||||
local {mode := Equal} $ do
|
||||
compare0 ctx sTy.zero sl tl
|
||||
compare0 ctx sTy.one sr tr
|
||||
compareType' ctx (Eq {ty = sTy, l = sl, r = sr, _})
|
||||
(Eq {ty = tTy, l = tl, r = tr, _}) = do
|
||||
compareType ctx sTy.zero tTy.zero
|
||||
compareType ctx sTy.one tTy.one
|
||||
local {mode := Equal} $ do
|
||||
Term.compare0 ctx sTy.zero sl tl
|
||||
Term.compare0 ctx sTy.one sr tr
|
||||
|
||||
E e => do
|
||||
E f <- pure t | _ => err
|
||||
-- no fanciness needed here cos anything other than a neutral
|
||||
-- has been inlined by whnfD
|
||||
compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
compareType' ctx (E e) (E f) = do
|
||||
-- no fanciness needed here cos anything other than a neutral
|
||||
-- has been inlined by whnfD
|
||||
Elim.compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
|
||||
||| assumes the elim is already typechecked! only does the work necessary
|
||||
||| to calculate the overall type
|
||||
private covering
|
||||
computeElimType : TContext q 0 n -> (e : Elim q 0 n) ->
|
||||
(0 ne : NotRedex defs e) =>
|
||||
(0 ne : NotRedex defs e) ->
|
||||
m (Term q 0 n)
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (F x) = do
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (F x) _ = do
|
||||
defs <- lookupFree' defs x
|
||||
pure $ defs.type.get
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (B i) = do
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (B i) _ = do
|
||||
pure $ ctx !! i
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (f :@ s) {ne} = do
|
||||
(_, arg, res) <- computeElimType ctx f {ne = noOr1 ne} >>= expectPi defs
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (f :@ s) ne = do
|
||||
(_, arg, res) <- expectPi defs !(computeElimType ctx f (noOr1 ne))
|
||||
pure $ sub1 res (s :# arg)
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (CasePair {pair, ret, _}) = do
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (CasePair {pair, ret, _}) _ = do
|
||||
pure $ sub1 ret pair
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (f :% p) {ne} = do
|
||||
(ty, _, _) <- computeElimType ctx f {ne = noOr1 ne} >>= expectEq defs
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (f :% p) ne = do
|
||||
(ty, _, _) <- expectEq defs !(computeElimType ctx f (noOr1 ne))
|
||||
pure $ dsub1 ty p
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (_ :# ty) = do
|
||||
computeElimType ctx (_ :# ty) _ = do
|
||||
pure ty
|
||||
|
||||
private covering
|
||||
|
|
@ -213,13 +226,12 @@ parameters (defs : Definitions' q _) {auto _ : (CanEqual q m, Eq q)}
|
|||
(e : Elim q 0 n) -> DimConst -> (0 ne : NotRedex defs e) ->
|
||||
m (Elim q 0 n)
|
||||
replaceEnd ctx e p ne = do
|
||||
(ty, l, r) <- computeElimType ctx e >>= expectEq defs
|
||||
(ty, l, r) <- expectEq defs !(computeElimType ctx e ne)
|
||||
pure $ ends l r p :# dsub1 ty (K p)
|
||||
|
||||
namespace Elim
|
||||
-- [fixme] the following code ends up repeating a lot of work in the
|
||||
-- computeElimType calls. the results should be shared better
|
||||
|
||||
export covering %inline
|
||||
compare0 : TContext q 0 n -> (e, f : Elim q 0 n) -> m ()
|
||||
compare0 ctx e f =
|
||||
|
|
@ -227,48 +239,50 @@ parameters (defs : Definitions' q _) {auto _ : (CanEqual q m, Eq q)}
|
|||
Element f nf = whnfD defs f
|
||||
in
|
||||
-- [fixme] there is a better way to do this "isSubSing" stuff for sure
|
||||
unless (isSubSing !(computeElimType ctx e)) $ compare0' ctx e f
|
||||
unless (isSubSing defs !(computeElimType ctx e ne)) $
|
||||
compare0' ctx e f ne nf
|
||||
|
||||
private covering
|
||||
compare0' : TContext q 0 n ->
|
||||
(e, f : Elim q 0 n) ->
|
||||
(0 ne : NotRedex defs e) => (0 nf : NotRedex defs f) =>
|
||||
(0 ne : NotRedex defs e) -> (0 nf : NotRedex defs f) ->
|
||||
m ()
|
||||
-- replace applied equalities with the appropriate end first
|
||||
-- e.g. e : Eq [i ⇒ A] s t ⊢ e 0 = s : A‹0/i›
|
||||
compare0' ctx (e :% K p) f {ne} =
|
||||
-- e.g. e : Eq [i ⇒ A] s t ⊢ e 𝟎 = s : A‹𝟎/i›
|
||||
compare0' ctx (e :% K p) f ne nf =
|
||||
compare0 ctx !(replaceEnd ctx e p $ noOr1 ne) f
|
||||
compare0' ctx e (f :% K q) {nf} =
|
||||
compare0' ctx e (f :% K q) ne nf =
|
||||
compare0 ctx e !(replaceEnd ctx f q $ noOr1 nf)
|
||||
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(F x) f@(F y) = unless (x == y) $ clashE e f
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(F _) f = clashE e f
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(F x) f@(F y) _ _ = unless (x == y) $ clashE e f
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(F _) f _ _ = clashE e f
|
||||
|
||||
compare0' ctx e@(B i) f@(B j) = unless (i == j) $ clashE e f
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(B _) f = clashE e f
|
||||
compare0' ctx e@(B i) f@(B j) _ _ = unless (i == j) $ clashE e f
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(B _) f _ _ = clashE e f
|
||||
|
||||
compare0' ctx (e :@ s) (f :@ t) {ne} = local {mode := Equal} $ do
|
||||
compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
(_, arg, _) <- computeElimType ctx e {ne = noOr1 ne} >>= expectPi defs
|
||||
compare0 ctx arg s t
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(_ :@ _) f = clashE e f
|
||||
|
||||
compare0' ctx (CasePair epi e _ eret _ _ ebody)
|
||||
(CasePair fpi f _ fret _ _ fbody) {ne} =
|
||||
compare0' ctx (e :@ s) (f :@ t) ne nf =
|
||||
local {mode := Equal} $ do
|
||||
compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
ety <- computeElimType ctx e {ne = noOr1 ne}
|
||||
(_, arg, _) <- expectPi defs !(computeElimType ctx e (noOr1 ne))
|
||||
Term.compare0 ctx arg s t
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(_ :@ _) f _ _ = clashE e f
|
||||
|
||||
compare0' ctx (CasePair epi e _ eret _ _ ebody)
|
||||
(CasePair fpi f _ fret _ _ fbody) ne nf =
|
||||
local {mode := Equal} $ do
|
||||
compare0 ctx e f
|
||||
ety <- computeElimType ctx e (noOr1 ne)
|
||||
compareType (ctx :< ety) eret.term fret.term
|
||||
(fst, snd) <- expectSig defs ety
|
||||
compare0 (ctx :< fst :< snd.term) (substCasePairRet ety eret)
|
||||
Term.compare0 (ctx :< fst :< snd.term) (substCasePairRet ety eret)
|
||||
ebody.term fbody.term
|
||||
unless (epi == fpi) $ throwError $ ClashQ epi fpi
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(CasePair {}) f = clashE e f
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(CasePair {}) f _ _ = clashE e f
|
||||
|
||||
compare0' ctx (s :# a) (t :# b) = do
|
||||
compareType ctx a b
|
||||
compare0 ctx a s t
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(_ :# _) f = clashE e f
|
||||
compare0' ctx (s :# a) (t :# _) _ _ = Term.compare0 ctx a s t
|
||||
compare0' ctx (s :# a) f _ _ = Term.compare0 ctx a s (E f)
|
||||
compare0' ctx e (t :# b) _ _ = Term.compare0 ctx b (E e) t
|
||||
compare0' _ e@(_ :# _) f _ _ = clashE e f
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
parameters {auto _ : (HasDefs' q _ m, HasErr q m, Eq q)}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ mutual
|
|||
||| `CasePair 𝜋 𝑒 𝑟 𝐴 𝑥 𝑦 𝑡` is
|
||||
||| `𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝜋 · 𝑒 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝑟 ⇒ 𝐴 𝐨𝐟 { (𝑥, 𝑦) ⇒ 𝑡 }`
|
||||
CasePair : (qty : q) -> (pair : Elim q d n) ->
|
||||
(r : Name) -> (ret : ScopeTerm q d n) ->
|
||||
(r : Name) -> (ret : ScopeTerm q d n) ->
|
||||
(x, y : Name) -> (body : ScopeTermN 2 q d n) ->
|
||||
Elim q d n
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -146,6 +146,11 @@ public export %inline
|
|||
Eq0 : (ty, l, r : Term q d n) -> Term q d n
|
||||
Eq0 {ty, l, r} = Eq {i = "_", ty = DUnused ty, l, r}
|
||||
|
||||
||| non dependent pair type
|
||||
public export %inline
|
||||
And : (fst, snd : Term q d n) -> Term q d n
|
||||
And {fst, snd} = Sig {x = "_", fst, snd = TUnused snd}
|
||||
|
||||
||| same as `F` but as a term
|
||||
public export %inline
|
||||
FT : Name -> Term q d n
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ record InferResult q d n where
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
public export
|
||||
data EqMode = Equal | Sub
|
||||
data EqMode = Equal | Sub | Super
|
||||
%runElab derive "EqMode" [Generic, Meta, Eq, Ord, DecEq, Show]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -138,8 +138,15 @@ HasErr q = MonadError (Error q)
|
|||
|
||||
export %inline
|
||||
ucmp : EqMode -> Universe -> Universe -> Bool
|
||||
ucmp Sub = (<=)
|
||||
ucmp Equal = (==)
|
||||
ucmp Sub = (<=)
|
||||
ucmp Super = (>=)
|
||||
|
||||
export %inline
|
||||
flip : EqMode -> EqMode
|
||||
flip Equal = Equal
|
||||
flip Sub = Super
|
||||
flip Super = Sub
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
parameters {auto _ : HasErr q m}
|
||||
|
|
@ -172,7 +179,7 @@ lookupFree' defs x =
|
|||
Nothing => throwError $ NotInScope x
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
export
|
||||
public export
|
||||
substCasePairRet : Term q d n -> ScopeTerm q d n -> Term q d (2 + n)
|
||||
substCasePairRet dty retty =
|
||||
let arg = Pair (BVT 0) (BVT 1) :# (dty // fromNat 2) in
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,4 +14,4 @@ allTests = [
|
|||
Typechecker.tests
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
main = TAP.main !getTestOpts allTests
|
||||
main = TAP.main !getTestOpts ["all" :- allTests]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ defGlobals = fromList
|
|||
("a", mkAbstract Any $ FT "A"),
|
||||
("a'", mkAbstract Any $ FT "A"),
|
||||
("b", mkAbstract Any $ FT "B"),
|
||||
("f", mkAbstract Any $ Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))]
|
||||
("f", mkAbstract Any $ Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A")),
|
||||
("id", mkDef Any (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A")) (["x"] :\\ BVT 0)),
|
||||
("eq-ab", mkAbstract Zero $ Eq0 (TYPE 0) (FT "A") (FT "B"))]
|
||||
|
||||
parameters (label : String) (act : Lazy (M ()))
|
||||
{default defGlobals globals : Definitions Three}
|
||||
|
|
@ -45,15 +47,15 @@ parameters {default 0 d, n : Nat}
|
|||
export
|
||||
tests : Test
|
||||
tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
||||
note #""s{t,…}" for term substs; "s‹p,…›" for dim substs"#,
|
||||
note #""0=1 ⊢ 𝒥" means that 𝒥 holds in an inconsistent dim context"#,
|
||||
note #""s{…}" for term substs; "s‹…›" for dim substs"#,
|
||||
|
||||
"universes" :- [
|
||||
testEq "★₀ ≡ ★₀" $
|
||||
testEq "★₀ = ★₀" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0),
|
||||
testNeq "★₀ ≢ ★₁" $
|
||||
testNeq "★₀ ≠ ★₁" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 2) (TYPE 0) (TYPE 1),
|
||||
testNeq "★₁ ≢ ★₀" $
|
||||
testNeq "★₁ ≠ ★₀" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 2) (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0),
|
||||
testEq "★₀ <: ★₀" $
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0),
|
||||
|
|
@ -64,33 +66,15 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"pi" :- [
|
||||
note #""A ⊸ B" for (1·A) → B"#,
|
||||
note #""A ⇾ B" for (0·A) → B"#,
|
||||
testEq "A ⊸ B ≡ A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 0) tm tm,
|
||||
testNeq "A ⇾ B ≢ A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (FT "A") (FT "B")
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 0) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
testEq "0=1 ⊢ A ⇾ B ≢ A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (FT "A") (FT "B")
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 0) tm1 tm2 {eqs = ZeroIsOne},
|
||||
testEq "A ⊸ B <: A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 0) tm tm,
|
||||
testNeq "A ⇾ B ≮: A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (FT "A") (FT "B")
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 0) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
testEq "★₀ ⇾ ★₀ ≡ ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
note #""𝐴 ⊸ 𝐵" for (1·𝐴) → 𝐵"#,
|
||||
note #""𝐴 ⇾ 𝐵" for (0·𝐴) → 𝐵"#,
|
||||
testEq "★₀ ⇾ ★₀ = ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
let tm = Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0) in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 1) tm tm,
|
||||
testEq "★₀ ⇾ ★₀ <: ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
let tm = Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0) in
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 1) tm tm,
|
||||
testNeq "★₁ ⊸ ★₀ ≢ ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
testNeq "★₁ ⊸ ★₀ ≠ ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0)
|
||||
tm2 = Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0) in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 2) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
|
|
@ -98,10 +82,6 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
let tm1 = Arr One (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0)
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0) in
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 2) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
testNeq "★₀ ⊸ ★₀ ≢ ★₀ ⇾ ★₁" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0)
|
||||
tm2 = Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 1) in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 2) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
testEq "★₀ ⊸ ★₀ <: ★₀ ⊸ ★₁" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr One (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0)
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (TYPE 0) (TYPE 1) in
|
||||
|
|
@ -109,11 +89,35 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
testEq "★₀ ⊸ ★₀ <: ★₀ ⊸ ★₁" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr One (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0)
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (TYPE 0) (TYPE 1) in
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 2) tm1 tm2
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 2) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
testEq "A ⊸ B = A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 0) tm tm,
|
||||
testEq "A ⊸ B <: A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 0) tm tm,
|
||||
note "incompatible quantities",
|
||||
testNeq "★₀ ⊸ ★₀ ≠ ★₀ ⇾ ★₁" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0)
|
||||
tm2 = Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 1) in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 2) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
testNeq "A ⇾ B ≠ A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (FT "A") (FT "B")
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 0) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
testNeq "A ⇾ B ≮: A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (FT "A") (FT "B")
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
subT [<] (TYPE 0) tm1 tm2,
|
||||
testEq "0=1 ⊢ A ⇾ B = A ⊸ B" $
|
||||
let tm1 = Arr Zero (FT "A") (FT "B")
|
||||
tm2 = Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B") in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 0) tm1 tm2 {eqs = ZeroIsOne},
|
||||
note "[todo] should π ≤ ρ ⊢ (ρ·A) → B <: (π·A) → B?"
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"lambda" :- [
|
||||
testEq "λ x ⇒ [x] ≡ λ x ⇒ [x]" $
|
||||
testEq "λ x ⇒ [x] = λ x ⇒ [x]" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(["x"] :\\ BVT 0)
|
||||
(["x"] :\\ BVT 0),
|
||||
|
|
@ -121,7 +125,7 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
subT [<] (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(["x"] :\\ BVT 0)
|
||||
(["x"] :\\ BVT 0),
|
||||
testEq "λ x ⇒ [x] ≡ λ y ⇒ [y]" $
|
||||
testEq "λ x ⇒ [x] = λ y ⇒ [y]" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(["x"] :\\ BVT 0)
|
||||
(["y"] :\\ BVT 0),
|
||||
|
|
@ -129,74 +133,124 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
equalT [<] (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(["x"] :\\ BVT 0)
|
||||
(["y"] :\\ BVT 0),
|
||||
testNeq "λ x y ⇒ [x] ≢ λ x y ⇒ [y]" $
|
||||
testNeq "λ x y ⇒ [x] ≠ λ x y ⇒ [y]" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (Arr One (FT "A") $ Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(["x", "y"] :\\ BVT 1)
|
||||
(["x", "y"] :\\ BVT 0),
|
||||
testEq "λ x ⇒ [a] ≡ λ x ⇒ [a] (TUsed vs TUnused)" $
|
||||
testEq "λ x ⇒ [a] = λ x ⇒ [a] (TUsed vs TUnused)" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (Arr Zero (FT "B") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(Lam "x" $ TUsed $ FT "a")
|
||||
(Lam "x" $ TUnused $ FT "a"),
|
||||
testEq "λ x ⇒ [f [x]] ≡ [f] (η)" $
|
||||
testEq "λ x ⇒ [f [x]] = [f] (η)" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(["x"] :\\ E (F "f" :@ BVT 0))
|
||||
(FT "f")
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"eq type" :- [
|
||||
testEq "(★₀ = ★₀ : ★₁) ≡ (★₀ = ★₀ : ★₁)" $
|
||||
testEq "(★₀ ≡ ★₀ : ★₁) = (★₀ ≡ ★₀ : ★₁)" $
|
||||
let tm = Eq0 (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0) in
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 2) tm tm,
|
||||
testEq "A ≔ ★₁ ⊢ (★₀ = ★₀ : ★₁) ≡ (★₀ = ★₀ : A)"
|
||||
testEq "A ≔ ★₁ ⊢ (★₀ ≡ ★₀ : ★₁) = (★₀ ≡ ★₀ : A)"
|
||||
{globals = fromList [("A", mkDef zero (TYPE 2) (TYPE 1))]} $
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 2)
|
||||
(Eq0 (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0))
|
||||
(Eq0 (FT "A") (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0))
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"equalities" :-
|
||||
"equalities and uip" :-
|
||||
let refl : Term q d n -> Term q d n -> Elim q d n
|
||||
refl a x = (DLam "_" $ DUnused x) :# (Eq0 a x x)
|
||||
in
|
||||
[
|
||||
note #""refl [A] x" is an abbreviation for "(λᴰi ⇒ x) ∷ (x ≡ x : A)""#,
|
||||
testEq "refl [A] a ≡ refl [A] a" $
|
||||
note "binds before ∥ are globals, after it are BVs",
|
||||
testEq "refl [A] a = refl [A] a" $
|
||||
equalE [<] (refl (FT "A") (FT "a")) (refl (FT "A") (FT "a")),
|
||||
testEq "p : (a ≡ a' : A), q : (a ≡ a' : A) ⊢ p ≡ q (free)"
|
||||
|
||||
testEq "p : (a ≡ a' : A), q : (a ≡ a' : A) ∥ ⊢ p = q (free)"
|
||||
{globals =
|
||||
let def = mkAbstract Zero $ Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a'") in
|
||||
defGlobals `mergeLeft` fromList [("p", def), ("q", def)]} $
|
||||
equalE [<] (F "p") (F "q"),
|
||||
testEq "x : (a ≡ a' : A), y : (a ≡ a' : A) ⊢ x ≡ y (bound)" $
|
||||
|
||||
testEq "∥ x : (a ≡ a' : A), y : (a ≡ a' : A) ⊢ x = y (bound)" $
|
||||
let ty : forall n. Term Three 0 n := Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a'") in
|
||||
equalE [< ty, ty] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2}
|
||||
equalE [< ty, ty] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2},
|
||||
|
||||
testEq "∥ x : [(a ≡ a' : A) ∷ Type 0], y : [ditto] ⊢ x = y" $
|
||||
let ty : forall n. Term Three 0 n
|
||||
:= E (Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a'") :# TYPE 0) in
|
||||
equalE [< ty, ty] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2},
|
||||
|
||||
testEq "E ≔ a ≡ a' : A, EE ≔ E ∥ x : EE, y : EE ⊢ x = y"
|
||||
{globals = defGlobals `mergeLeft` fromList
|
||||
[("E", mkDef zero (TYPE 0) (Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a'"))),
|
||||
("EE", mkDef zero (TYPE 0) (FT "E"))]} $
|
||||
equalE [< FT "EE", FT "EE"] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2},
|
||||
|
||||
testEq "E ≔ a ≡ a' : A, EE ≔ E ∥ x : EE, y : E ⊢ x = y"
|
||||
{globals = defGlobals `mergeLeft` fromList
|
||||
[("E", mkDef zero (TYPE 0) (Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a'"))),
|
||||
("EE", mkDef zero (TYPE 0) (FT "E"))]} $
|
||||
equalE [< FT "EE", FT "E"] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2},
|
||||
|
||||
testEq "E ≔ a ≡ a' : A ∥ x : E, y : E ⊢ x = y"
|
||||
{globals = defGlobals `mergeLeft` fromList
|
||||
[("E", mkDef zero (TYPE 0) (Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a'")))]} $
|
||||
equalE [< FT "E", FT "E"] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2},
|
||||
|
||||
testEq "E ≔ a ≡ a' : A ∥ x : (E×E), y : (E×E) ⊢ x = y"
|
||||
{globals = defGlobals `mergeLeft` fromList
|
||||
[("E", mkDef zero (TYPE 0) (Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a'")))]} $
|
||||
let ty : forall n. Term Three 0 n
|
||||
:= Sig "_" (FT "E") $ TUnused $ FT "E" in
|
||||
equalE [< ty, ty] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2},
|
||||
|
||||
testEq "E ≔ a ≡ a' : A, F ≔ E × E ∥ x : F, y : F ⊢ x = y"
|
||||
{globals = defGlobals `mergeLeft` fromList
|
||||
[("E", mkDef zero (TYPE 0) (Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a'"))),
|
||||
("W", mkDef zero (TYPE 0) (FT "E" `And` FT "E"))]} $
|
||||
equalE [< FT "W", FT "W"] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"term closure" :- [
|
||||
note "𝑖, 𝑗 for bound variables pointing outside of the current expr",
|
||||
testEq "[𝑖]{} ≡ [𝑖]" $
|
||||
testEq "[#0]{} = [#0] : A" $
|
||||
equalT [< FT "A"] (FT "A") {n = 1}
|
||||
(CloT (BVT 0) id)
|
||||
(BVT 0),
|
||||
testEq "[𝑖]{a/𝑖} ≡ [a]" $
|
||||
testEq "[#0]{a} = [a] : A" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (FT "A")
|
||||
(CloT (BVT 0) (F "a" ::: id))
|
||||
(FT "a"),
|
||||
testEq "[𝑖]{a/𝑖,b/𝑗} ≡ [a]" $
|
||||
testEq "[#0]{a,b} = [a] : A" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (FT "A")
|
||||
(CloT (BVT 0) (F "a" ::: F "b" ::: id))
|
||||
(FT "a"),
|
||||
testEq "(λy. [𝑖]){y/y, a/𝑖} ≡ λy. [a] (TUnused)" $
|
||||
testEq "[#1]{a,b} = [b] : A" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (FT "A")
|
||||
(CloT (BVT 1) (F "a" ::: F "b" ::: id))
|
||||
(FT "b"),
|
||||
testEq "(λy. [#1]){a} = λy. [a] : B ⇾ A (TUnused)" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (Arr Zero (FT "B") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(CloT (Lam "y" $ TUnused $ BVT 0) (F "a" ::: id))
|
||||
(Lam "y" $ TUnused $ FT "a"),
|
||||
testEq "(λy. [𝑖]){y/y, a/𝑖} ≡ λy. [a] (TUsed)" $
|
||||
testEq "(λy. [#1]){a} = λy. [a] : B ⇾ A (TUsed)" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (Arr Zero (FT "B") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(CloT (["y"] :\\ BVT 1) (F "a" ::: id))
|
||||
(["y"] :\\ FT "a")
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
todo "term d-closure",
|
||||
"term d-closure" :- [
|
||||
testEq "★₀‹𝟎› = ★₀ : ★₁" $
|
||||
equalT {d = 1} [<] (TYPE 1) (DCloT (TYPE 0) (K Zero ::: id)) (TYPE 0),
|
||||
testEq "(λᴰ i ⇒ a)‹𝟎› = (λᴰ i ⇒ a) : (a ≡ a : A)" $
|
||||
equalT {d = 1} [<]
|
||||
(Eq0 (FT "A") (FT "a") (FT "a"))
|
||||
(DCloT (["i"] :\\% FT "a") (K Zero ::: id))
|
||||
(["i"] :\\% FT "a"),
|
||||
note "it is hard to think of well-typed terms with big dctxs"
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"free var" :-
|
||||
let au_bu = fromList
|
||||
|
|
@ -206,17 +260,19 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
[("A", mkDef Any (TYPE (U 1)) (TYPE (U 0))),
|
||||
("B", mkDef Any (TYPE (U 1)) (FT "A"))]
|
||||
in [
|
||||
testEq "A ≡ A" $
|
||||
testEq "A = A" $
|
||||
equalE [<] (F "A") (F "A"),
|
||||
testNeq "A ≢ B" $
|
||||
testNeq "A ≠ B" $
|
||||
equalE [<] (F "A") (F "B"),
|
||||
testEq "0=1 ⊢ A ≡ B" $
|
||||
testEq "0=1 ⊢ A = B" $
|
||||
equalE {eqs = ZeroIsOne} [<] (F "A") (F "B"),
|
||||
testEq "A : ★₁ ≔ ★₀ ⊢ A ≡ (★₀ ∷ ★₁)" {globals = au_bu} $
|
||||
testEq "A : ★₁ ≔ ★₀ ⊢ A = (★₀ ∷ ★₁)" {globals = au_bu} $
|
||||
equalE [<] (F "A") (TYPE 0 :# TYPE 1),
|
||||
testEq "A ≔ ★₀, B ≔ ★₀ ⊢ A ≡ B" {globals = au_bu} $
|
||||
testEq "A : ★₁ ≔ ★₀ ⊢ [A] = ★₀" {globals = au_bu} $
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 1) (FT "A") (TYPE 0),
|
||||
testEq "A ≔ ★₀, B ≔ ★₀ ⊢ A = B" {globals = au_bu} $
|
||||
equalE [<] (F "A") (F "B"),
|
||||
testEq "A ≔ ★₀, B ≔ A ⊢ A ≡ B" {globals = au_ba} $
|
||||
testEq "A ≔ ★₀, B ≔ A ⊢ A = B" {globals = au_ba} $
|
||||
equalE [<] (F "A") (F "B"),
|
||||
testEq "A <: A" $
|
||||
subE [<] (F "A") (F "A"),
|
||||
|
|
@ -226,7 +282,8 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
{globals = fromList [("A", mkDef Any (TYPE 3) (TYPE 0)),
|
||||
("B", mkDef Any (TYPE 3) (TYPE 2))]} $
|
||||
subE [<] (F "A") (F "B"),
|
||||
testEq "A : ★₁👈 ≔ ★₀, B : ★₃ ≔ ★₂ ⊢ A <: B"
|
||||
note "(A and B in different universes)",
|
||||
testEq "A : ★₁ ≔ ★₀, B : ★₃ ≔ ★₂ ⊢ A <: B"
|
||||
{globals = fromList [("A", mkDef Any (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0)),
|
||||
("B", mkDef Any (TYPE 3) (TYPE 2))]} $
|
||||
subE [<] (F "A") (F "B"),
|
||||
|
|
@ -235,30 +292,33 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"bound var" :- [
|
||||
note "𝑖, 𝑗 for distinct bound variables",
|
||||
testEq "𝑖 ≡ 𝑖" $
|
||||
testEq "#0 = #0" $
|
||||
equalE [< TYPE 0] (BV 0) (BV 0) {n = 1},
|
||||
testNeq "𝑖 ≢ 𝑗" $
|
||||
testEq "#0 <: #0" $
|
||||
subE [< TYPE 0] (BV 0) (BV 0) {n = 1},
|
||||
testNeq "#0 ≠ #1" $
|
||||
equalE [< TYPE 0, TYPE 0] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2},
|
||||
testEq "0=1 ⊢ 𝑖 ≡ 𝑗" $
|
||||
testNeq "#0 ≮: #1" $
|
||||
subE [< TYPE 0, TYPE 0] (BV 0) (BV 1) {n = 2},
|
||||
testEq "0=1 ⊢ #0 = #1" $
|
||||
equalE [< TYPE 0, TYPE 0] (BV 0) (BV 1)
|
||||
{n = 2, eqs = ZeroIsOne}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"application" :- [
|
||||
testEq "f [a] ≡ f [a]" $
|
||||
testEq "f [a] = f [a]" $
|
||||
equalE [<] (F "f" :@ FT "a") (F "f" :@ FT "a"),
|
||||
testEq "f [a] <: f [a]" $
|
||||
subE [<] (F "f" :@ FT "a") (F "f" :@ FT "a"),
|
||||
testEq "(λ x ⇒ [x] ∷ A ⊸ A) a ≡ ([a ∷ A] ∷ A) (β)" $
|
||||
testEq "(λ x ⇒ [x] ∷ A ⊸ A) a = ([a ∷ A] ∷ A) (β)" $
|
||||
equalE [<]
|
||||
(((["x"] :\\ BVT 0) :# Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A")) :@ FT "a")
|
||||
(E (FT "a" :# FT "A") :# FT "A"),
|
||||
testEq "(λ x ⇒ [x] ∷ A ⊸ A) a ≡ a (βυ)" $
|
||||
testEq "(λ x ⇒ [x] ∷ A ⊸ A) a = a (βυ)" $
|
||||
equalE [<]
|
||||
(((["x"] :\\ BVT 0) :# Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A")) :@ FT "a")
|
||||
(F "a"),
|
||||
testEq "(λ g ⇒ [g [a]] ∷ ⋯)) [f] ≡ (λ y ⇒ [f [y]] ∷ ⋯) [a] (β↘↙)" $
|
||||
testEq "(λ g ⇒ [g [a]] ∷ ⋯)) [f] = (λ y ⇒ [f [y]] ∷ ⋯) [a] (β↘↙)" $
|
||||
let a = FT "A"; a2a = (Arr One a a) in
|
||||
equalE [<]
|
||||
(((["g"] :\\ E (BV 0 :@ FT "a")) :# Arr One a2a a) :@ FT "f")
|
||||
|
|
@ -267,25 +327,68 @@ tests = "equality & subtyping" :- [
|
|||
subE [<]
|
||||
(((["x"] :\\ BVT 0) :# (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))) :@ FT "a")
|
||||
(F "a"),
|
||||
testEq "id : A ⊸ A ≔ λ x ⇒ [x] ⊢ id [a] ≡ a"
|
||||
{globals = defGlobals `mergeLeft` fromList
|
||||
[("id", mkDef Any (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(["x"] :\\ BVT 0))]} $
|
||||
equalE [<] (F "id" :@ FT "a") (F "a")
|
||||
note "id : A ⊸ A ≔ λ x ⇒ [x]",
|
||||
testEq "id [a] = a" $ equalE [<] (F "id" :@ FT "a") (F "a"),
|
||||
testEq "id [a] <: a" $ subE [<] (F "id" :@ FT "a") (F "a")
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
todo "dim application",
|
||||
|
||||
todo "annotation",
|
||||
"annotation" :- [
|
||||
testEq "(λ x ⇒ f [x]) ∷ A ⊸ A = [f] ∷ A ⊸ A" $
|
||||
equalE [<]
|
||||
((["x"] :\\ E (F "f" :@ BVT 0)) :# Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(FT "f" :# Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A")),
|
||||
testEq "[f] ∷ A ⊸ A = f" $
|
||||
equalE [<] (FT "f" :# Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A")) (F "f"),
|
||||
testEq "(λ x ⇒ f [x]) ∷ A ⊸ A = f" $
|
||||
equalE [<]
|
||||
((["x"] :\\ E (F "f" :@ BVT 0)) :# Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A"))
|
||||
(F "f")
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
todo "elim closure",
|
||||
"elim closure" :- [
|
||||
testEq "#0{a} = a" $
|
||||
equalE [<] (CloE (BV 0) (F "a" ::: id)) (F "a"),
|
||||
testEq "#1{a} = #0" $
|
||||
equalE [< FT "A"] (CloE (BV 1) (F "a" ::: id)) (BV 0) {n = 1}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
todo "elim d-closure",
|
||||
"elim d-closure" :- [
|
||||
note "0·eq-ab : (A ≡ B : ★₀)",
|
||||
testEq "(eq-ab #0)‹𝟎› = eq-ab 𝟎" $
|
||||
equalE {d = 1} [<]
|
||||
(DCloE (F "eq-ab" :% BV 0) (K Zero ::: id))
|
||||
(F "eq-ab" :% K Zero),
|
||||
testEq "(eq-ab #0)‹𝟎› = A" $
|
||||
equalE {d = 1} [<] (DCloE (F "eq-ab" :% BV 0) (K Zero ::: id)) (F "A"),
|
||||
testEq "(eq-ab #0)‹𝟏› = B" $
|
||||
equalE {d = 1} [<] (DCloE (F "eq-ab" :% BV 0) (K One ::: id)) (F "B"),
|
||||
testNeq "(eq-ab #0)‹𝟏› ≠ A" $
|
||||
equalE {d = 1} [<] (DCloE (F "eq-ab" :% BV 0) (K One ::: id)) (F "A"),
|
||||
testEq "(eq-ab #0)‹#0,𝟎› = (eq-ab #0)" $
|
||||
equalE {d = 2} [<]
|
||||
(DCloE (F "eq-ab" :% BV 0) (BV 0 ::: K Zero ::: id))
|
||||
(F "eq-ab" :% BV 0),
|
||||
testNeq "(eq-ab #0)‹𝟎› ≠ (eq-ab 𝟎)" $
|
||||
equalE {d = 2} [<]
|
||||
(DCloE (F "eq-ab" :% BV 0) (BV 0 ::: K Zero ::: id))
|
||||
(F "eq-ab" :% K Zero),
|
||||
testEq "#0‹𝟎› = #0 # term and dim vars distinct" $
|
||||
equalE {d = 1, n = 1} [< FT "A"] (DCloE (BV 0) (K Zero ::: id)) (BV 0),
|
||||
testEq "a‹𝟎› = a" $
|
||||
equalE {d = 1} [<] (DCloE (F "a") (K Zero ::: id)) (F "a"),
|
||||
testEq "(f [a])‹𝟎› = f‹𝟎› [a]‹𝟎›" $
|
||||
let th = (K Zero ::: id) in
|
||||
equalE {d = 1} [<]
|
||||
(DCloE (F "f" :@ FT "a") th)
|
||||
(DCloE (F "f") th :@ DCloT (FT "a") th)
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"clashes" :- [
|
||||
testNeq "★₀ ≢ ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
testNeq "★₀ ≠ ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0) (Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0)),
|
||||
testEq "0=1 ⊢ ★₀ ≡ ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
testEq "0=1 ⊢ ★₀ = ★₀ ⇾ ★₀" $
|
||||
equalT [<] (TYPE 1) (TYPE 0) (Arr Zero (TYPE 0) (TYPE 0))
|
||||
{eqs = ZeroIsOne},
|
||||
todo "others"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ M = ReaderT (Definitions Three) $ Either (Error Three)
|
|||
reflTy : IsQty q => Term q d n
|
||||
reflTy =
|
||||
Pi zero "A" (TYPE 0) $ TUsed $
|
||||
Pi zero "x" (BVT 0) $ TUsed $
|
||||
Pi one "x" (BVT 0) $ TUsed $
|
||||
Eq0 (BVT 1) (BVT 0) (BVT 0)
|
||||
|
||||
reflDef : IsQty q => Term q d n
|
||||
|
|
@ -27,9 +27,13 @@ defGlobals = fromList
|
|||
("B", mkAbstract Zero $ TYPE 0),
|
||||
("C", mkAbstract Zero $ TYPE 1),
|
||||
("D", mkAbstract Zero $ TYPE 1),
|
||||
("P", mkAbstract Zero $ Arr Any (FT "A") (TYPE 0)),
|
||||
("a", mkAbstract Any $ FT "A"),
|
||||
("b", mkAbstract Any $ FT "B"),
|
||||
("f", mkAbstract Any $ Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A")),
|
||||
("g", mkAbstract Any $ Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B")),
|
||||
("p", mkAbstract Any $ Pi One "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $ E $ F "P" :@ BVT 0),
|
||||
("q", mkAbstract Any $ Pi One "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $ E $ F "P" :@ BVT 0),
|
||||
("refl", mkDef Any reflTy reflDef)]
|
||||
|
||||
parameters (label : String) (act : Lazy (M ()))
|
||||
|
|
@ -79,60 +83,81 @@ tests = "typechecker" :- [
|
|||
|
||||
"function types" :- [
|
||||
note "A, B : ★₀; C, D : ★₁",
|
||||
testTC "0 · (1·A) → B ⇐ ★₀" $
|
||||
testTC "0 · A ⊸ B ⇐ ★₀" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) szero (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B")) (TYPE 0),
|
||||
testTC "0 · (1·A) → B ⇐ ★₁👈" $
|
||||
note "subtyping",
|
||||
testTC "0 · A ⊸ B ⇐ ★₁" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) szero (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "B")) (TYPE 1),
|
||||
testTC "0 · (1·C) → D ⇐ ★₁" $
|
||||
testTC "0 · C ⊸ D ⇐ ★₁" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) szero (Arr One (FT "C") (FT "D")) (TYPE 1),
|
||||
testTCFail "0 · (1·C) → D ⇍ ★₀" $
|
||||
testTCFail "0 · C ⊸ D ⇍ ★₀" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) szero (Arr One (FT "C") (FT "D")) (TYPE 0)
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"free vars" :- [
|
||||
note "A : ★₀",
|
||||
testTC "0 · A ⇒ ★₀" $
|
||||
inferAs (ctx [<]) szero (F "A") (TYPE 0),
|
||||
testTC "0 · A ⇐👈 ★₀" $
|
||||
note "check",
|
||||
testTC "0 · A ⇐ ★₀" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) szero (FT "A") (TYPE 0),
|
||||
testTC "0 · A ⇐ ★₁👈" $
|
||||
note "subtyping",
|
||||
testTC "0 · A ⇐ ★₁" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) szero (FT "A") (TYPE 1),
|
||||
testTCFail "1👈 · A ⇏ ★₀" $
|
||||
note "(fail) runtime-relevant type",
|
||||
testTCFail "1 · A ⇏ ★₀" $
|
||||
infer_ (ctx [<]) sone (F "A"),
|
||||
note "refl : (0·A : ★₀) → (0·x : A) → (x ≡ x : A) ≔ (λ A x ⇒ λᴰ _ ⇒ x)",
|
||||
testTC "1 · refl ⇒ {type of refl}" $
|
||||
inferAs (ctx [<]) sone (F "refl") reflTy,
|
||||
testTC "1 · refl ⇐ {type of refl}" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) sone (FT "refl") reflTy
|
||||
note "refl : (0·A : ★₀) → (1·x : A) → (x ≡ x : A) ≔ (λ A x ⇒ λᴰ _ ⇒ x)",
|
||||
testTC "1 · refl ⇒ ⋯" $ inferAs (ctx [<]) sone (F "refl") reflTy,
|
||||
testTC "1 · refl ⇐ ⋯" $ check_ (ctx [<]) sone (FT "refl") reflTy
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"lambda" :- [
|
||||
testTC #"1 · (λ A x ⇒ refl A x) ⇐ {type of refl, see "free vars"}"# $
|
||||
note "linear & unrestricted identity",
|
||||
testTC "1 · (λ x ⇒ x) ⇐ A ⊸ A" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) sone (["x"] :\\ BVT 0) (Arr One (FT "A") (FT "A")),
|
||||
testTC "1 · (λ x ⇒ x) ⇐ A → A" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) sone (["x"] :\\ BVT 0) (Arr Any (FT "A") (FT "A")),
|
||||
note "(fail) zero binding used relevantly",
|
||||
testTCFail "1 · (λ x ⇒ x) ⇍ A ⇾ A" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) sone (["x"] :\\ BVT 0) (Arr Zero (FT "A") (FT "A")),
|
||||
note "(but ok in overall erased context)",
|
||||
testTC "0 · (λ x ⇒ x) ⇐ A ⇾ A" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) szero (["x"] :\\ BVT 0) (Arr Zero (FT "A") (FT "A")),
|
||||
testTC "1 · (λ A x ⇒ refl A x) ⇐ ⋯ # (type of refl)" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) sone
|
||||
(["A", "x"] :\\ E (F "refl" :@@ [BVT 1, BVT 0]))
|
||||
reflTy
|
||||
reflTy,
|
||||
testTC "1 · (λ A x ⇒ λᴰ i ⇒ x) ⇐ ⋯ # (def. and type of refl)" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) sone reflDef reflTy
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
||||
"misc" :- [
|
||||
testTC "funext"
|
||||
{globals = fromList
|
||||
[("A", mkAbstract Zero $ TYPE 0),
|
||||
("B", mkAbstract Zero $ Arr Any (FT "A") (TYPE 0)),
|
||||
("f", mkAbstract Any $
|
||||
Pi Any "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $ E $ F "B" :@ BVT 0),
|
||||
("g", mkAbstract Any $
|
||||
Pi Any "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $ E $ F "B" :@ BVT 0)]} $
|
||||
-- 0·A : Type, 0·B : ω·A → Type,
|
||||
-- ω·f, g : (ω·x : A) → B x
|
||||
-- ⊢
|
||||
-- 0·funext : (ω·eq : (0·x : A) → f x ≡ g x) → f ≡ g
|
||||
-- = λ eq ⇒ λᴰ i ⇒ λ x ⇒ eq x i
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) szero
|
||||
note "0·A : Type, 0·P : A → Type, ω·p : (1·x : A) → P x",
|
||||
note "⊢",
|
||||
note "1 · λ x y xy ⇒ λᴰ i ⇒ p (xy i)",
|
||||
note " ⇐ (0·x, y : A) → (1·xy : x ≡ y) → Eq [i ⇒ P (xy i)] (p x) (p y)",
|
||||
testTC "cong" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) sone
|
||||
(["x", "y", "xy"] :\\ ["i"] :\\% E (F "p" :@ E (BV 0 :% BV 0)))
|
||||
(Pi Zero "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $
|
||||
Pi Zero "y" (FT "A") $ TUsed $
|
||||
Pi One "xy" (Eq0 (FT "A") (BVT 1) (BVT 0)) $ TUsed $
|
||||
Eq "i" (DUsed $ E $ F "P" :@ E (BV 0 :% BV 0))
|
||||
(E $ F "p" :@ BVT 2) (E $ F "p" :@ BVT 1)),
|
||||
note "0·A : Type, 0·P : ω·A → Type,",
|
||||
note "ω·p, q : (1·x : A) → P x",
|
||||
note "⊢",
|
||||
note "1 · λ eq ⇒ λᴰ i ⇒ λ x ⇒ eq x i",
|
||||
note " ⇐ (1·eq : (1·x : A) → p x ≡ q x) → p ≡ q",
|
||||
testTC "funext" $
|
||||
check_ (ctx [<]) sone
|
||||
(["eq"] :\\ ["i"] :\\% ["x"] :\\ E (BV 1 :@ BVT 0 :% BV 0))
|
||||
(Pi Any "eq"
|
||||
(Pi Zero "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $
|
||||
Eq0 (E $ F "B" :@ BVT 0)
|
||||
(E $ F "f" :@ BVT 0) (E $ F "g" :@ BVT 0)) $ TUsed $
|
||||
Eq0 (Pi Any "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $ E $ F "B" :@ BVT 0)
|
||||
(FT "f") (FT "g"))
|
||||
(Pi One "eq"
|
||||
(Pi One "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $
|
||||
Eq0 (E $ F "P" :@ BVT 0)
|
||||
(E $ F "p" :@ BVT 0) (E $ F "q" :@ BVT 0)) $ TUsed $
|
||||
Eq0 (Pi Any "x" (FT "A") $ TUsed $ E $ F "P" :@ BVT 0)
|
||||
(FT "p") (FT "q"))
|
||||
]
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue